Bug 10672
Summary: | HTTP to FTP switch during bootnet installation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | van der Kleut <van.der.kleut> |
Component: | installer | Assignee: | Matt Wilson <msw> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2000-08-17 21:56:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
van der Kleut
2000-04-08 22:27:08 UTC
I have found the same problem The dialog titles "FTP Error" (or something like that) during a HTTP installation is actually a bug. The title on the dialog is incorrect and the installer has not just changed installation methods :-) Sounds like you are having a problem with the webserver you are installing from. If the netstg2.img file actually there (it should be in the /RedHat/base directory), then I would make sure that you can get to it using a web browser. If you are able to browse and see the file, then the HTTP installation should work without any problems. I am having the same problem. Here are the entries from my Apache log files: error_log (when I try to run RH HTTP netinstall): [Mon May 15 11:19:23 2000] [error] [client 10.1.2.1] Invalid URI in request GET i386/RedHat/base/netstg2.img HTTP/0.9 access_log (when I successfully access the same file from lynx): 10.1.3.2 - - [15/May/2000:11:42:28 -0400] "GET /i386/RedHat/base/netstg2.img HTTP/1.0" 200 2197746 In reply to jturner, I tried your suggestion before I posted the bug, but the directory/file was accessible thru a browser over my Intranet. I had previously distributed RH 6.1 succesfully under the same webdirectory structure and permissions and the same webserver installation as the RH 6.2 install. I think from my logfile entries the solution should be quite easy. It looks like the HTTP installation agent in RH6.2 does not prepend a '/' in front of the directory name automatically. I bet if you write e.g. "/i386" instead of "i386" as the name of the directory containing the installation files, it will work. You are correct. |