| Summary: |
Macro %scl_files is empty - should we use %files runtime -f filelist ? |
| Product: |
[Fedora] Fedora
|
Reporter: |
Pavel Raiskup <praiskup> |
| Component: |
scl-utils | Assignee: |
Jan Zeleny <jzeleny> |
| Status: |
CLOSED
CURRENTRELEASE
|
QA Contact: |
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: |
unspecified
|
Docs Contact: |
|
| Priority: |
unspecified
|
|
|
| Version: |
rawhide | CC: |
bkabrda, hhorak, jzeleny
|
| Target Milestone: |
--- | |
|
| Target Release: |
--- | |
|
| Hardware: |
Unspecified | |
|
| OS: |
Unspecified | |
|
| Whiteboard: |
|
|
Fixed In Version:
|
|
Doc Type:
|
Bug Fix
|
|
Doc Text:
|
|
Story Points:
|
---
|
|
Clone Of:
|
|
Environment:
|
|
|
Last Closed:
|
2014-12-12 11:02:26 UTC
|
Type:
|
Bug
|
|
Regression:
|
---
|
Mount Type:
|
---
|
|
Documentation:
|
---
|
CRM:
|
|
|
Verified Versions:
|
|
Category:
|
---
|
|
oVirt Team:
|
---
|
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
|
|
|
Cloudforms Team:
|
---
|
Target Upstream Version:
|
|
|
Embargoed:
|
|
| |
| Bug Depends On: |
1072319
|
|
|
| Bug Blocks: |
965565, 1040470, 1057169, 1072281, 1072401, 1072789, 1073458, 1074012, 1074337, 1075025, 1076159, 1079968, 1080036, 1080048, 1090361, 1091008, 1121094
|
|
|
I applied something like following patch to my SCL, is that correct approach? +%if 0%{?fedora} >= 21 +%files runtime -f filelist +%else %files runtime %scl_files +%endif If yes, could we fix documentation http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/Software_Collections_Guide/sect-Creating_a_Meta_Package.html ? Thanks, Pavel