Bug 1091089

Summary: TagLib license should be "LGPLv2 or MPLv1.1", not "LGPLv2 and MPL"
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David King <amigadave>
Component: taglibAssignee: Rex Dieter <rdieter>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: drizt72, rdieter
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-25 12:26:29 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
fix the license tag none

Description David King 2014-04-24 20:42:19 UTC 
While going through a package review for mingw-taglib in bug 1077935, the license of TagLib came up, and it seems that the license in the .spec is incorrect. According to the license header in source files, the license is an "or" type and not an "and" type:

https://github.com/taglib/taglib/commit/5b03541038982eb76a3954e4383ad4a1f89dc279

It is also helpful to clarify the version of the MPL.
Comment 1 David King 2014-04-24 20:44:34 UTC 
Created attachment 889438 [details]
fix the license tag
Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2014-04-25 12:26:29 UTC 
thanks, fixed

%changelog
* Fri Apr 25 2014 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 1.9.1-3
- License: GPLv2 or MPLv1.1 (#1091089)