Bug 1091089 - TagLib license should be "LGPLv2 or MPLv1.1", not "LGPLv2 and MPL"
Summary: TagLib license should be "LGPLv2 or MPLv1.1", not "LGPLv2 and MPL"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: taglib
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rex Dieter
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-04-24 20:42 UTC by David King
Modified: 2014-04-25 12:26 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-25 12:26:29 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
fix the license tag (1004 bytes, patch)
2014-04-24 20:44 UTC, David King 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description David King 2014-04-24 20:42:19 UTC 
While going through a package review for mingw-taglib in bug 1077935, the license of TagLib came up, and it seems that the license in the .spec is incorrect. According to the license header in source files, the license is an "or" type and not an "and" type:

https://github.com/taglib/taglib/commit/5b03541038982eb76a3954e4383ad4a1f89dc279

It is also helpful to clarify the version of the MPL.
Comment 1 David King 2014-04-24 20:44:34 UTC 
Created attachment 889438 [details]
fix the license tag
Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2014-04-25 12:26:29 UTC 
thanks, fixed

%changelog
* Fri Apr 25 2014 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 1.9.1-3
- License: GPLv2 or MPLv1.1 (#1091089)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.