Bug 1100934
| Summary: | [UEFI] blscfg.mod is missing in grubx64.efi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Chris Murphy <bugzilla> |
| Component: | grub2 | Assignee: | Peter Jones <pjones> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | bcl, bugzilla, fdeutsch, lkundrak, mads, pjones, walters |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-08 11:46:51 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1299420 | ||
|
Description
Chris Murphy
2014-05-24 03:11:10 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22 Is this actually still an issue? How could bug 1101359 be filed if this bug was still an issue? Yes it's still an issue. The grub2-2.02-0.25.fc23 grub2.spec file doesn't drag in blscfg.module into the signed grubx64.efi file, so it's not available. In bug 1101359, I've manually made blscfg.mod available by installing grub2-efi-modules, then copying /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi/ to the EFI system partition at EFI/fedora/ Do you know why it's not beeing pulled into the signed grubx64.efi file? And do you know how this could be fixed? It's a question for Peter. But my guess is, since it doesn't follow either of two written specs, hence bug 1101359, or the ostree BLS variant, and therefore isn't being used by anyone, why bother rolling it in? This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Fabian, I'm not sure if including blscfg.mod in grubx64.efi is still desired on your end, but to move this forward it might make sense to just submit a PR for grub to add it in and see if it's accepted. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/grub2.git/tree/grub2.spec Looks like it'd go in line 228: GRUB_MODULES=" all_video boot btrfs cat chain configfile echo \ Chris, we actually settled with grubby which is mostly doing the job. but yes, opening a PR is probably a good step to learn about the bls acceptance. This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '24'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 24 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-08-08. Fedora 24 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |