Bug 1105078
| Summary: | [GSS](6.3.0)HHH-9062 Envers validity audit strategy: end revision timestamp is not stored in tables for joined subclasses | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | Reporter: | Fedor Gavrilov <fgavrilo> |
| Component: | Hibernate | Assignee: | Gail Badner <gbadner> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Martin Simka <msimka> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Russell Dickenson <rdickens> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.2.0 | CC: | fgavrilo, gbadner, msimka, smumford |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | EAP 6.3.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Known Issue | |
| Doc Text: |
In this release of JBoss EAP 6, when Envers is used with a validity audit strategy to audit an entity hierarchy using JOINED inheritance, the resulting audit tables created for the joined subclasses do not contain the end revision column.
This can complicate partitioning the audit tables for joined subclasses.
This issue is under investigation.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-08-15 18:43:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Fedor Gavrilov
2014-06-05 10:42:17 UTC
Fedor Gavrilov, this issue shows version 6.2.4. Is that correct? Gail, I've set version to the latest because it seems that nobody tried to fix that yet, so it should be present in teh latest version of EAP. My wrong, probably. I am pretty sure that customer uses 6.2.0. I explicitly asked him to verify the version. Is this fine for you to proceed or should we wait for the customer's reply? Customer confirmed - version is 6.2.0 Are there any estimates for this bug? I'm not sure if this is really a bug. I need to discuss with someone knowledgeable about partitioning database tables. I'm not sure I'll have an answer immediately. It might be better to say that this is in the process of being researched. Hello, Are there any news regarding this bug/not a bug? This would be a new feature. I'm closing as NOTABUG. |