Bug 110668
Summary: | fetchmail from FC1 won't work with krb5-libs from RH9 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Göran Uddeborg <goeran> |
Component: | fetchmail | Assignee: | Miloslav Trmač <mitr> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-06-02 17:55:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Göran Uddeborg
2003-11-22 17:07:19 UTC
I'm sorry about the late reply. Basically, "don't do that". rpm automatic dependencies only notice so much, and determining the exact package version (which may depend on the distribution you use) is not worth the effort. If you need to import packages from different distributions, rebuild the source RPM. This should eliminate all similar issues. > rpm automatic dependencies only notice so much,
> and determining the exact package version ... is not worth the effort.
Of course. But I thought that when I now had stumbled on this one, I could
report it so you could note it in the package. To avoid that others were hit by
THAT particular issue.
It wouldn't have to be the exact minimum version. It could be a conservative
approximation. Like the version included in the same release.
It will never be perfect. But why not do it as good as possible, when the
effort is minimal?
|