Bug 1106994

Summary: kawa: FTBFS in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Component: kawaAssignee: Christopher Meng <i>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: i, mizdebsk, yselkowi
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: kawa-1.14-1.fc21 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-24 14:26:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 819551    
Bug Blocks: 819505, 991858, 1022128, 1105908    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 18:50:37 UTC 
Your package kawa failed to build from source in current rawhide.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6994518

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 18:50:40 UTC 
Created attachment 905789 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 18:50:43 UTC 
Created attachment 905791 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Dennis Gilmore 2014-06-09 18:50:44 UTC 
Created attachment 905792 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Yaakov Selkowitz 2014-06-19 02:31:17 UTC 
Cause is bug 819551 (BR: servlet25 from tomcat6, retired).
Comment 5 Christopher Meng 2014-06-19 06:59:10 UTC 
*** Bug 819551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2014-06-20 18:02:20 UTC 
I'm just reviewing the code, in gnu/kawa/servlet/ChangeLog I can see from 1.14 servlet 3.0 support is added. 

So migrating to tomcat7 shouldn't be a big problem now.

But I'm encountering this issue again and again:

make[1]: *** [java-classes.stamp] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Comment 7 Christopher Meng 2014-06-24 14:25:53 UTC 
*** Bug 992655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***