Bug 1114702

Summary:	Review Request: python3-pycairo - Python 3 bindings for the cairo library
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	i, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-07-01 10:26:06 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Miro Hrončok 2014-06-30 17:26:30 UTC

Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/python3-pycairo.spec
SRPM URL: http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python3-pycairo-1.10.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: Python 3 bindings for the cairo library.
Fedora Account System Username: churchyard

Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2014-07-01 01:01:03 UTC

I've asked many times on -devel trying to persuade someone to update the package in Fedora, and I only get responses but no actions.

This package is a dup of the existing one: python3-cairo

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2014-07-01 09:55:50 UTC

Oh, never though of searching it by that name :(

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2014-07-01 10:21:31 UTC

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> I've asked many times on -devel trying to persuade someone to update the
> package in Fedora, and I only get responses but no actions.

What you mean by that?

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2014-07-01 10:23:40 UTC

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #3)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> > I've asked many times on -devel trying to persuade someone to update the
> > package in Fedora, and I only get responses but no actions.
> 
> What you mean by that?

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/191248.html

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2014-07-01 10:26:06 UTC

Cant see how this is relevant to this Review Request. Probably a question for upstream, isn't it?

Anyway, closing this.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 634700 ***

Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2014-07-01 10:43:58 UTC

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5)
> Cant see how this is relevant to this Review Request. Probably a question
> for upstream, isn't it?

Not upstream, but the relevant nonresponsive package maintainer in Fedora. I have no idea.