Bug 1114702 - Review Request: python3-pycairo - Python 3 bindings for the cairo library
Summary: Review Request: python3-pycairo - Python 3 bindings for the cairo library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 634700
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-30 17:26 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2014-07-01 10:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-01 10:26:06 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2014-06-30 17:26:30 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/python3-pycairo.spec
SRPM URL: http://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python3-pycairo-1.10.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: Python 3 bindings for the cairo library.
Fedora Account System Username: churchyard

Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2014-07-01 01:01:03 UTC
I've asked many times on -devel trying to persuade someone to update the package in Fedora, and I only get responses but no actions.

This package is a dup of the existing one: python3-cairo

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2014-07-01 09:55:50 UTC
Oh, never though of searching it by that name :(

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2014-07-01 10:21:31 UTC
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> I've asked many times on -devel trying to persuade someone to update the
> package in Fedora, and I only get responses but no actions.

What you mean by that?

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2014-07-01 10:23:40 UTC
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #3)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> > I've asked many times on -devel trying to persuade someone to update the
> > package in Fedora, and I only get responses but no actions.
> 
> What you mean by that?

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/191248.html

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2014-07-01 10:26:06 UTC
Cant see how this is relevant to this Review Request. Probably a question for upstream, isn't it?

Anyway, closing this.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 634700 ***

Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2014-07-01 10:43:58 UTC
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5)
> Cant see how this is relevant to this Review Request. Probably a question
> for upstream, isn't it?

Not upstream, but the relevant nonresponsive package maintainer in Fedora. I have no idea.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.