Bug 1115491
| Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-shoulda-context - Context framework extracted from Shoulda | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Josef Stribny <jstribny> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | hhorak, jstribny, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jstribny:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rubygem-shoulda-context-1.2.1-1.fc21 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-07-07 07:27:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1060172, 1115554 | ||
|
Description
Vít Ondruch
2014-07-02 13:08:14 UTC
I will take it for a review. * According to the guidelines the description of the sub-package should end with a dot (.) -> Documentation for %{name}.
Otherwise the spec looks good, rpmlint does not compain, package builds, installs, runs. Please fix the minor issue before pushing. ==> APPROVED.
Thanks for the re-review! Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-shoulda-context New Branches: master Owners: vondruch InitialCC: Misformatted request. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-shoulda-context New Branches: Owners: vondruch InitialCC: So lets try without the master. Master is retired and I care just about master. What is the intention of this request? This is re-review of retired package. The intention is to unretire the package at master. So may be there should be not "change request" at all? Got it, done. Thanks Jon! |