Bug 1115607
| Summary: | Edit Domain dialogue box fails to resize for over 13 lines on the vertical | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Robert McSwain <rmcswain> |
| Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | shani <sleviim> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Evelina Shames <eshames> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 3.4.0 | CC: | acanan, awels, derez, ebenahar, lsurette, mtessun, Rhev-m-bugs, scohen, sleviim, srevivo, tnisan |
| Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.3.0 | ||
| Target Release: | 4.3.0 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ovirt-engine-4.3.0_alpha | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-05-08 12:36:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Robert McSwain
2014-07-02 18:18:20 UTC
The entire dialog is defined in hard-coded numbers of pixels, so fixing this will essentially require redoing the UI completely. In light of the low priority, pushing out to 3.6. Need to check how this behaves in 4.2 after the UI redesign (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #6) > Need to check how this behaves in 4.2 after the UI redesign Raz, can you check it? Hi, Checked on rhvm-4.2.0-0.5.master.el7. The original issue was that the resize of the dialog box is not allowing the user to view all the content but the scrolling down does. In 4.2 the dialog box resize is disabled for all dialog boxes and the scrolling down in "Edit domain" is working. Shani, You've been doing a lot of work on this dialog lately, can you please asses how complicated will it be to make this dialog resizable? We used to have support for dialog resizing, which was enabled only for storage and disk dialogs (see: [1]). It was removed as part of the PF3 work [2], for lack of native support. However, the resize support was merely to enlarge the table horizontally, i.e. it won't expand the table's rows. So, solving this issue could be much more complicated, as it would mean some redesign of the entire luns table, as its dimensions are currently defined statically in IscsiStorageView. @Alex - is it applicable to have the support back using the new infra for expanding the window horizontally and for future support for vertically when possible. [1] http://i.imgur.com/nnMwcPh.png [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/72391/ No dialog resize support is not coming back (In reply to Alexander Wels from comment #11) > No dialog resize support is not coming back So why are we keeping this bug open? I don't know, maybe someone wants to redesign the dialog to solve the original issue of the information being presented in a form that would require re-sizing the dialog to make it all fit? Shani, there has been a few requests to make this dialog bigger, please see if this is possible WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:
[Found non-acked flags: '{'rhevm-4.3-ga': '?'}', ]
For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:
[Found non-acked flags: '{'rhevm-4.3-ga': '?'}', ]
For more info please contact: rhv-devops
WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:
[Found non-acked flags: '{'rhevm-4.3-ga': '?'}', ]
For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed:
[Found non-acked flags: '{'rhevm-4.3-ga': '?'}', ]
For more info please contact: rhv-devops
Verified on Engine 4.3.0-0.5 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:1085 |
