Bug 1119803

Summary: ECC supported curves list extension is missing in DTLS1 client hello
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Component: opensslAssignee: Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Hubert Kario <hkario>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.0CC: hkario, jherrman, ksrot, qe-baseos-security
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openssl-1.0.1e-37.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
The TLS extensions that were sent in the Datagram TLS (DTLS) ClientHello requests did previously not contain the list of the supported elliptic curves. As a consequence, the DTLS connections to servers using elliptic curves not supported by the OpenSSL client were aborted. With this update, the elliptic curve list extension is properly sent in the DTLS ClientHello requests, and DTLS connections are no longer aborted in the above circumstances.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1119800 Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 11:03:44 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tomas Mraz 2014-07-15 14:41:55 UTC
ECC supported curves list extension is missing in DTLS1 client hello message. Because we do not support all of the ECC curves that are currently widely used this severally worsens the interoperability of DTLS1 protocol in our openssl package.

Upstream recently fixed this issue.

Comment 4 Tomas Mraz 2014-10-16 07:36:01 UTC
*** Bug 1153331 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 11:03:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0478.html