Bug 1128439
Summary: | Incorrect conflict with hylafax+ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | giulioo |
Component: | mgetty | Assignee: | Michal Sekletar <msekleta> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.0 | CC: | msekleta, pmatilai |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-08-12 07:59:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
giulioo
2014-08-10 13:07:18 UTC
I'm not able to reproduce with similar test-packages (would've been surprised if I could). Does the bogus conflict go away if you do 'rpm --rebuilddb'? Yes, you are right, this is not a bug, sorry. Since mgetty is a package included in RHEL7, while hylafax+ is not, I didn't think to do $ rpm --conflicts mgetty hylafax+ I'll file a bug with mgetty, since the conflicts should be in mgetty-sendfax, not in mgetty. I tried closing this bug as not-a-bug myself but couldn't find a field in the bugzilla web interface to do it. Ah, so there was a conflict in the other direction. Should've thought of that but I'm just back from vacation so brain not entirely functional yet :) We can just as well reassign this bug to mgetty, just adjusting the bug summary to match. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1129054 *** |