Bug 1129308
| Summary: | package optional sugar backup control panel | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Gonzalo Odiard <godiard> | ||||
| Component: | sugar | Assignee: | Simon Schampijer <simon> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | john.j5live, pbrobinson, sebastian, simon, smparrish | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-08-13 09:06:31 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Gonzalo Odiard
2014-08-12 14:56:25 UTC
Created attachment 926089 [details]
Proposed enhancement to the spec
Sugar 0.102 add a new control panel section to do backup/restore of the Journal. The proposed patch creates the needed rpm. Another change important in sugar 0.102 is the use of dconf. I think would be good add it as a dependency in the rpm. Many times sugar will be installed with Gnome, but in other cases, like SoaS or small devices like the XO-1, that is not true. > Another change important in sugar 0.102 is the use of dconf. I think would
> be good add it as a dependency in the rpm. Many times sugar will be
> installed with Gnome, but in other cases, like SoaS or small devices like
> the XO-1, that is not true.
Missed that, does that mean that GConf2 is no longer needed?
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > > Another change important in sugar 0.102 is the use of dconf. I think would > > be good add it as a dependency in the rpm. Many times sugar will be > > installed with Gnome, but in other cases, like SoaS or small devices like > > the XO-1, that is not true. > > Missed that, does that mean that GConf2 is no longer needed? We still use GConf to keep compatibility with old activities. (In reply to Gonzalo Odiard from comment #4) > (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3) > > > Another change important in sugar 0.102 is the use of dconf. I think would > > > be good add it as a dependency in the rpm. Many times sugar will be > > > installed with Gnome, but in other cases, like SoaS or small devices like > > > the XO-1, that is not true. > > > > Missed that, does that mean that GConf2 is no longer needed? > > We still use GConf to keep compatibility with old activities. By old activities do you mean gtk2 Activities? If so the dependency can go there. If the core sugar shell no longer depends on GConf2 I can remove it as a build dep. So is it used by the shell? Is used by the shell, because we save the configs in dconf _and_ in gconf. There are a few configs not ported yet, and we will continue updating the config for compatibility with old activities (who read the configs) for a time. Fixed in F-21+ |