Bug 1129321
Summary: | Request epel7 branch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Luigi Iotti <luigi> |
Component: | cpanspec | Assignee: | Steven Pritchard <steve> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel7 | CC: | ktdreyer, paul, perl-devel, ppisar, psabata, steve, strobert |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-08-12 15:11:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Luigi Iotti
2014-08-12 15:05:46 UTC
Please, use the existing package review for this (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages). Also, requesting new branches in this manner and listing someone else as the maintainer is somewhat rude. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 168838 *** I apologize, sincerely. I read that document and used the template I found there, but honestly IMHO it was hard to understand clearly where to post it. I wrote "steve" because he is listed as the package owner here https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/cpanspec/bugs/ (I got there trying to "decode" the explanation in the same document). Sorry Luigi I suggest that you ask in Bug 168838 if Steve wants to maintain the package in EPEL. I suspect you'll not get a response because Steve has only been very sporadically around in Fedora for the last couple of years. After a week or two, make the branch request in that ticket with yourself as maintainer and add a note that Steve would be welcome to the package should he choose to respond in the future. That should get the package branched for you without offending anybody. |