Hide Forgot
Spec Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/cpanspec/cpanspec.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/cpanspec-1.59-1.src.rpm Description: cpanspec generates spec files for Perl modules from CPAN for Fedora Extras. The quality of the spec file is our primary concern. It is assumed that maintainers will need to do some (hopefully small) amount of work to clean up the generated spec file to make the package build and to verify that all of the information contained in the spec file is correct. Note: I've been working on this for around a year and a half. The most recent version includes options to download modules from your favorite CPAN mirror, generate source rpms, and even attempt builds.
Is this the proper group? Group: Development/Libraries # rpmlint cpanspec W: cpanspec no-url-tag Guess we need an upstream repo even though this is a purely Fedora item?
Steven - Do you still have any interest in packaging these? Would be nice as I use it to package CPAN modules.
All I need is a review... :-)
(In reply to comment #3) > All I need is a review... :-) See comment 1 for my first question. I would suggest Development/Tools group and I'm pretty sure we need an upstream source for tarballs for verification.
http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/cpanspec-1.59-2.src.rpm * Wed Feb 01 2006 Steven Pritchard <steve@kspei.com> 1.59-2 - URL/Source0 on SourceForge. - Use a more appropriate Group.
Good: - rpmlint checks return: - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL/Artistic) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Approved
*** Bug 1129321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
May I ask if Steve is going to maintain this package even in Epel7. I built the current Epel6 src rpm (cpanspec-1.78-6.el6.src.rpm) in 7 and it seems to be working fine.
not sure if you are referring to Steven Pritchard or Steven Roberts (me). I am guessing the former.
Yes, I was referring to Steven Pritchard. Sorry for the confusion, but the package maintainer is listed only as "steve" here https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/cpanspec/bugs/
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cpanspec New Branches: epel7 Owners: Lux Since Steve did not respond in about 2 months, I would like to ask if I may maintain the cpanspec package for epel7. Obviously Steve would be welcome shoud he respond in the future.
You forgot to set the fedora-cvs flag, Luigi :) Since I'm now maintaining the package in el5/el6 and all the fc branches, I'm re-requesting this primarily for myself, with you as co-maintainer. Let me know if you're interested in working on other branches as well.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cpanspec New Branches: epel7 Owners: psabata Lux InitialCC: perl-sig
Lux is not a valid FAS username.
Alright, just me then. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cpanspec New Branches: epel7 Owners: psabata InitialCC: perl-sig
Oh, I see you created the branch, despite resetting the cvs flag. Thanks and never mind then.
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #12) > You forgot to set the fedora-cvs flag, Luigi :) > Since I'm now maintaining the package in el5/el6 and all the fc branches, > I'm re-requesting this primarily for myself, with you as co-maintainer. > > Let me know if you're interested in working on other branches as well. Hmm I just wanted to have cpanspec in el7 as well. I would have been happy to contribute it, but it turns out I would absolutely need more experience in using this Bugzilla site. Thank you.
(In reply to Luigi Iotti from comment #17) > Hmm I just wanted to have cpanspec in el7 as well. I'll take care of it for now :) > I would have been happy > to contribute it, but it turns out I would absolutely need more experience > in using this Bugzilla site. Thank you. That's great to hear! Don't worry, everybody had to learn in the beginning. I've sent you some info on becoming a contributor in a mail.
cpanspec-1.78-19.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpanspec-1.78-19.el7
cpanspec-1.78-19.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.