Bug 1130862

Summary: java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless: alternatives refer to incorrect symlink
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michel Alexandre Salim <michel>
Component: java-1.8.0-openjdkAssignee: Deepak Bhole <dbhole>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 21CC: ahughes, dbhole, jvanek, omajid
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-18 10:59:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michel Alexandre Salim 2014-08-18 05:06:07 UTC 
Description of problem:
The alternatives link installed by java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless point to /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64, but only /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk (without .x86_64 suffix) is present.

Creating that directory by hand resolves the problem of /etc/alternatives/java not resolving to an existing file.

Also, no package owns /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk and /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.11-15.b12.fc21.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -e --nodeps java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless
2. yum install java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless
3. alternatives --list | grep jre_1.8.0
4. ls -l /usr/lib/jvm | grep jre-1.8.0

Actual results:
Alternatives output:
jre_1.8.0_openjdk	auto	/usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.11-15.b12.fc21.x86_64
jre_1.8.0	auto	/usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64

but only /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk and /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.11-15.b12.fc21.x86_64 exist

Expected results:
There shouldn't be a mismatch. Also, note that the openjdk link doesn't have an arch suffix.

Additional info:
Comment 1 jiri vanek 2014-08-18 10:59:00 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1130247 ***