Bug 1132482

Summary:	[RFE][GUI over REST API gaps] missing remove multiple snapshots (in a single request)
Product:	[oVirt] ovirt-engine	Reporter:	Einav Cohen <ecohen>
Component:	RestAPI	Assignee:	Nobody <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Aharon Canan <acanan>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.5.0	CC:	acanan, amureini, bazulay, bugs, derez, ecohen, iheim, juan.hernandez, lsurette, oramraz, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, scohen, tnisan, yeylon, ykaul, ylavi
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Improvement
Target Release:	4.0.0	Flags:	ylavi: ovirt-4.0.0? rule-engine: planning_ack? ylavi: devel_ack? rule-engine: testing_ack?
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	storage
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-12-03 17:44:02 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Storage	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1132506

Description Einav Cohen 2014-08-21 12:30:53 UTC

we are missing the ability to remove multiple snapshots at once from the rest-api. 

I assume that this can be worked around by making multiple requests for removing a single snapshot, however in this case, we might miss a special logic that is applied due to the "awareness" of the command that multiple snapshots are being removed (similar to RunMultipleAction - see bug 1132246)

Comment 1 Allon Mureinik 2015-12-03 16:57:39 UTC

Einav, is this still a goal for 4.0?

Comment 2 Einav Cohen 2015-12-03 17:00:27 UTC

(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #1)
> Einav, is this still a goal for 4.0?

it is not - and I just closed bug 1132506 accordingly. thanks!

Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2015-12-03 17:44:02 UTC

(In reply to Einav Cohen from comment #2)
> (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #1)
> > Einav, is this still a goal for 4.0?
> 
> it is not - and I just closed bug 1132506 accordingly. thanks!
Closing this one too based on that comment.