Bug 1132482 - [RFE][GUI over REST API gaps] missing remove multiple snapshots (in a single request)
Summary: [RFE][GUI over REST API gaps] missing remove multiple snapshots (in a single ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine
Classification: oVirt
Component: RestAPI
Version: 3.5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.0.0
Assignee: Nobody
QA Contact: Aharon Canan
URL:
Whiteboard: storage
Depends On:
Blocks: 1132506
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-08-21 12:30 UTC by Einav Cohen
Modified: 2019-04-28 14:17 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-03 17:44:02 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Embargoed:
ylavi: ovirt-4.0.0?
rule-engine: planning_ack?
ylavi: devel_ack?
rule-engine: testing_ack?

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1132246 0 unspecified CLOSED [GUI over REST API gaps] RunMultipleActions 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1132478 0 unspecified CLOSED [RFE][GUI over REST API gaps] missing move multiple disks (in a single request) 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1132246 1132478

Description Einav Cohen 2014-08-21 12:30:53 UTC 
we are missing the ability to remove multiple snapshots at once from the rest-api. 

I assume that this can be worked around by making multiple requests for removing a single snapshot, however in this case, we might miss a special logic that is applied due to the "awareness" of the command that multiple snapshots are being removed (similar to RunMultipleAction - see bug 1132246)
Comment 1 Allon Mureinik 2015-12-03 16:57:39 UTC 
Einav, is this still a goal for 4.0?
Comment 2 Einav Cohen 2015-12-03 17:00:27 UTC 
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #1)
> Einav, is this still a goal for 4.0?

it is not - and I just closed bug 1132506 accordingly. thanks!
Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2015-12-03 17:44:02 UTC 
(In reply to Einav Cohen from comment #2)
> (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #1)
> > Einav, is this still a goal for 4.0?
> 
> it is not - and I just closed bug 1132506 accordingly. thanks!
Closing this one too based on that comment.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.