Bug 1132548
Summary: | [RFE] Ceph RBD backend configuration for Cinder and Glance in OSP | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Scott Lewis <sclewis> |
Component: | openstack-foreman-installer | Assignee: | Crag Wolfe <cwolfe> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Yogev Rabl <yrabl> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 5.0 (RHEL 7) | CC: | christopher_dearborn, cwolfe, ddomingo, jacob_jacob, jdonohue, jstransk, mburns, mlopes, morazi, nlevine, nlevinki, pbrady, racedoro, rajini.karthik, rhos-maint, sclewis, scohen, slong, yeylon, yrabl |
Target Milestone: | z2 | Keywords: | FutureFeature, TestOnly |
Target Release: | Installer | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | MVP | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: |
The RHEL-OSP installer can now deploy Ceph RADOS Block Devices (RBD) as a backend for the Image or Block Storage services. With this enhancement, Ceph configuration options can be specified using the installer (OpenStack configuration files on controller and compute nodes can use Ceph for the Image or Block Storage services).
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1104856 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2014-11-04 17:02:12 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1104856 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1108193 |
Comment 2
Yogev Rabl
2014-08-26 07:32:18 UTC
Close as dup to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127863 ? is the only thing missing in this covered by bug 1127863 ? if so, please move back to TestOnly and ON_QA. openstack-foreman-installer's manifests set cinder and glance configuration files correctly when rbd is used as a backend. The largest chunk of work was completed in https://github.com/redhat-openstack/astapor/pull/358, but PR's 366 and 367 are also relevant. verified in version: ruby193-rubygem-staypuft-0.4.8-1.el6ost.noarch Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1800.html |