|Summary:||sanlock missing on i668 and armv7 architectures|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Daniel Berrangé <berrange>|
|Component:||sanlock||Assignee:||David Teigland <teigland>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||21||CC:||awilliam, cfeist, crobinso, dan, eblake, fsimonce, pbrobinson, teigland|
|Fixed In Version:||sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2014-09-11 02:44:07 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Daniel Berrangé 2014-08-28 11:17:31 UTC
Description of problem: libvirt on Fedora 21 / rawhide has broken dependencies due to missing sanlock packages [quote] libvirt has broken dependencies in the F-21 tree: On i386: libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.i686 requires sanlock >= 0:2.4 libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.i686 requires libsanlock_client.so.1 On armhfp: libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires sanlock >= 0:2.4 libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires libsanlock_client.so.1 Please resolve this as soon as possible. [/quote] This is caused by the recent change to sanlock commit d5d7f86f2a4d34048654f57ca2fca79f3556aec8 Author: David Teigland <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Mon Aug 18 13:54:40 2014 -0500 Update to sanlock-3.2.0 which added a bogus architecture restriction ExclusiveArch: x86_64 ppc64 aarch64 previously the architecture restriction was only applied on RHEL builds which is acceptable. Fedora packages though are required to be present on all architectures. If there is a problem requiring ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch, then it must have a documented bug describing the problem with the intent that it be resolved https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support "Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line" I have tested a scratch build of sanlock and it successfully builds on all Fedora architectures so please remove this ExclusiveArch. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7474066 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sanlock-3.2.1-1.fc21
Comment 1 Dan Horák 2014-08-28 11:34:04 UTC
yes, please remove the ExclusiveArch, with my secondary arch hat on, it would break libvirt on s390(x) and ppc64le at least
Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2014-08-28 12:26:52 UTC
sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2014-08-28 16:44:12 UTC
Package sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9895/sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Comment 4 Cole Robinson 2014-09-05 15:25:34 UTC
Proposing as alpha freeze exception: without this sanlock update, libvirt has broken deps on i686 and arm.
Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2014-09-10 18:12:31 UTC
Discussed at 2014-09-10 freeze exception review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-09-10/f21-blocker-review.2014-09-10-16.07.log.txt . Accepted as a freeze exception issue - we don't really need this for the release, but it'll stop people getting nagmails and shouldn't endanger composes at all.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2014-09-11 02:44:07 UTC
sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.