Bug 1134861 - sanlock missing on i668 and armv7 architectures
Summary: sanlock missing on i668 and armv7 architectures
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sanlock
Version: 21
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Teigland
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Whiteboard: AcceptedFreezeException
Depends On:
Blocks: F21AlphaFreezeException
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2014-08-28 11:17 UTC by Daniel Berrangé
Modified: 2014-09-11 02:44 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2014-09-11 02:44:07 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Daniel Berrangé 2014-08-28 11:17:31 UTC
Description of problem:
libvirt on Fedora 21 / rawhide has broken dependencies due to missing sanlock packages

  libvirt has broken dependencies in the F-21 tree:
  On i386:
        libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.i686 requires sanlock >= 0:2.4
        libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.i686 requires libsanlock_client.so.1
  On armhfp:
	libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires sanlock >= 0:2.4
        libvirt-lock-sanlock-1.2.7-2.fc21.armv7hl requires libsanlock_client.so.1
  Please resolve this as soon as possible.

This is caused by the recent change to sanlock

  commit d5d7f86f2a4d34048654f57ca2fca79f3556aec8
  Author: David Teigland <teigland>
  Date:   Mon Aug 18 13:54:40 2014 -0500

    Update to sanlock-3.2.0

which added a bogus architecture restriction

   ExclusiveArch:  x86_64 ppc64 aarch64

previously the architecture restriction was only applied on RHEL builds which is acceptable.

Fedora packages though are required to be present on all architectures. If there is a problem requiring ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch, then it must have a documented bug describing the problem with the intent that it be resolved


  "Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug
   filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package
   does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug
   number should then be placed in a comment, next to the
   corresponding ExcludeArch line"

I have tested a scratch build of sanlock and it successfully builds on all Fedora architectures so please remove this ExclusiveArch.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2014-08-28 11:34:04 UTC
yes, please remove the ExclusiveArch, with my secondary arch hat on, it would break libvirt on s390(x) and ppc64le at least

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2014-08-28 12:26:52 UTC
sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2014-08-28 16:44:12 UTC
Package sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 4 Cole Robinson 2014-09-05 15:25:34 UTC
Proposing as alpha freeze exception: without this sanlock update, libvirt has broken deps on i686 and arm.

Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2014-09-10 18:12:31 UTC
Discussed at 2014-09-10 freeze exception review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-09-10/f21-blocker-review.2014-09-10-16.07.log.txt . Accepted as a freeze exception issue - we don't really need this for the release, but it'll stop people getting nagmails and shouldn't endanger composes at all.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2014-09-11 02:44:07 UTC
sanlock-3.2.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.