Bug 1134981

Summary:	Update btrfs-progs to v3.16
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Eric Sandeen <esandeen>
Component:	btrfs-progs	Assignee:	Eric Sandeen <esandeen>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	XuWang <xuw>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.1	CC:	eguan, xinli
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Rebase
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	btrfs-progs-3.16-1.el7	Doc Type:	Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-03-05 13:13:22 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eric Sandeen 2014-08-28 14:37:20 UTC

Upstream has btrfs-progs v3.16 now, let's do that rebase as part of our quest to keep up with upstream in hopes of finding stability.  btrfs is still tech preview, rebasing is fine.

Comment 2 Eric Sandeen 2014-10-15 23:18:14 UTC

*** Bug 1051985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Eric Sandeen 2014-10-15 23:20:08 UTC

*** Bug 1016576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Eric Sandeen 2014-10-15 23:20:11 UTC

*** Bug 870276 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 XuWang 2015-01-26 00:32:49 UTC

Conver tests for RHEL-7.1 with btrfs-progs-3.16.2, on x86_64, s390x, works fine;on ppc64/ppc64le(which page size is 64K), gots a lot of segment fault.

For RHEL-7.1, we rebased to btrfs-progs-3.16.2. And we do tests for btrfs function/regression/stress for btrfs, which covers the tests for btrfs-progs. Also, we run btrfs-progs regressions.

We tests the mkfs.btrfs, mount, btrfsck, snapshot, subvolume, send/receive, resize, add/delete device, balance, seed device, space/inode cache, filesystem show/status, scrub, quota, replace functions. All of them can works fine on x86_64 and s390x archs, but not on ppc64/ppc64le. For those functions, man page also needs to be updated.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 13:13:22 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0534.html