Bug 1138121
Summary: | [RFE][ImportDomain] External LUN disk should be also discovered from the Lun | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Maor <mlipchuk> |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Maor <mlipchuk> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.5.0 | CC: | amureini, ecohen, gklein, iheim, lpeer, mlipchuk, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, yeylon |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | 3.5.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | storage | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2014-12-22 12:21:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Maor
2014-09-04 06:28:35 UTC
I do not understand this BZ. You do NOT import a target - you import a domain, which should not be presented as a LUN. (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #1) > I do not understand this BZ. > You do NOT import a target - you import a domain, which should not be > presented as a LUN. As described in the expected result: Direct Lun should be presented when trying to discover the target they are based on, and should be registered as a disk when the user desires to. The steps to reproduce should be: 1. Try to connect to a target contains LUN disk 2. 3. Again - any LUN is potentially a direct LUN. How would you discover it? How would you distinguish it used to be a direct LUN? Referring to Allon's comments at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138121#c3, Since direct LUN is an entity which is mainly managed by the user, it is more appropriate that the user will manage direct Lun disks on a Disaster Recovery scenario by adding it directly to the setup as it is already done today when adding a Direct Lun disk. The only "gap" which had to be considered was a VM which had only direct Lun disks, and this bug was already solved (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1138134), so this bug might not be relevant any more. Therefore closing it as Not a Bug |