Bug 1138121 - [RFE][ImportDomain] External LUN disk should be also discovered from the Lun
Summary: [RFE][ImportDomain] External LUN disk should be also discovered from the Lun
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine
Version: 3.5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.5.0
Assignee: Maor
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: storage
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-09-04 06:28 UTC by Maor
Modified: 2016-02-10 20:24 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-12-22 12:21:13 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Maor 2014-09-04 06:28:35 UTC
Description of problem:
Import Storage Domain of block Device should also import Lun disks which reflected by the Luns without Storage Domain they are contained in them

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to import target of iSCSI domain
2.
3.

Actual results:
No Direct Lun will be found

Expected results:
Direct Lun should be presented when trying to discover the target they are based on, and should be registered as a disk when the user desires to

Additional info:

Comment 1 Allon Mureinik 2014-09-04 11:17:44 UTC
I do not understand this BZ.
You do NOT import a target - you import a domain, which should not be presented as a LUN.

Comment 2 Maor 2014-09-30 09:41:49 UTC
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #1)
> I do not understand this BZ.
> You do NOT import a target - you import a domain, which should not be
> presented as a LUN.

As described in the expected result:
Direct Lun should be presented when trying to discover the target they are based on, and should be registered as a disk when the user desires to.

The steps to reproduce should be:
1. Try to connect to a target contains LUN disk
2.
3.

Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2014-10-07 18:16:59 UTC
Again - any LUN is potentially a direct LUN.
How would you discover it? How would you distinguish it used to be a direct LUN?

Comment 4 Maor 2014-12-22 12:21:13 UTC
Referring to Allon's comments at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138121#c3,
Since direct LUN is an entity which is mainly managed by the user, it is more appropriate that the user will manage direct Lun disks on a Disaster Recovery scenario by adding it directly to the setup as it is already done today when adding a Direct Lun disk.

The only "gap" which had to be considered was a VM which had only direct Lun disks, and this bug was already solved (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1138134), so this bug might not be relevant any more.
Therefore closing it as Not a Bug


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.