Bug 1147074
| Summary: | Review Request: qtxdg - Qt implementation of desktop specifications | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | i, package-review, rdieter |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-09-29 13:03:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Eugene A. Pivnev
2014-09-26 19:42:13 UTC
Does this conflict with libqtxdg? (I'm guessing yes, and if so, how do you plan on dealing with it?) Fyi, libqtxdg-0.5.3 is already in rawhide, so is this still needed? (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #2) > Fyi, libqtxdg-0.5.3 is already in rawhide, so is this still needed? 1. it is qt5 only 2. and it is not in f19..f20 and EL6/7 (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #1) > Does this conflict with libqtxdg? (I'm guessing yes, and if so, how do you > plan on dealing with it?) No fear. libqtxdg provides qt5 libs (with special names): https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/libqtxdg-qt5/ Another problem - that this (qtxdg) package conflicts with libqtxdg from my razorqt package. Solution is to repackage razorqt with qtxdg-devel-0.5.3. This is my next step. My recommendation: abandon this review, and build all libqtxdg-related stuff from the libqtxdg module/package And as you hinted, that means dropping the bundled one from razorqt to use the system copy instead. Current libqtxdg's maintainer is not callable at all. Hi don'n want to do anything. I need qtxdg-0.5.3 for as razorqt as lxqt For all of EL6/7 and F19+ I'm sorry File a bug to start the the unresponsive maintainer policy then (and please CC: me if you don't mind) Submitting the essentially the same software under a different package name is not really acceptable. (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #7) > File a bug to start the the unresponsive maintainer policy then (and please > CC: me if you don't mind) > > Submitting the essentially the same software under a different package name > is not really acceptable. Ok, I'll try last chance: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147204 (In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #6) > Current libqtxdg's maintainer is not callable at all. > Hi don'n want to do anything. > I need qtxdg-0.5.3 for as razorqt as lxqt > For all of EL6/7 and F19+ > I'm sorry I'm sorry, but "he doesn't want to do anything" doesn't mean you can introduce redundant packages in the Fedora. I hope Lubo can solve this soon. (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #9) > (In reply to Eugene A. Pivnev from comment #6) > > Current libqtxdg's maintainer is not callable at all. > > Hi don'n want to do anything. > > I need qtxdg-0.5.3 for as razorqt as lxqt > > For all of EL6/7 and F19+ > > I'm sorry > > I'm sorry, but "he doesn't want to do anything" doesn't mean you can > introduce redundant packages in the Fedora. > > I hope Lubo can solve this soon. I know that qtxdg is redundant, but libxtdg locks my job - to start LXQT. Lubo can solve - but don't want. Help me to stir up. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1147204 *** |