Bug 1157996
Summary: | Review Request: kanboard - Simple visual task board | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | José Edgardo López Vásquez <magjogui> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | William Moreno <williamjmorenor> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | echevemaster, e, karlthered, magjogui, package-review, ppisar, williamjmorenor |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-11 00:47:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 177841, 201449 |
Description
José Edgardo López Vásquez
2014-10-28 08:52:03 UTC
Magjoqui can you paste the direct links to the files? This is not due a cosmetic thing, generally, the srpm are revised with a tool called fedora-review which needs direct links. magjogui is one of the guys that I was mentor in Fudcon, so, I will take care of its package and its mentoring process I'm blocking it with FE-NEEDSPONSOR Thanks Eduardo, the links that you require: https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SPEC/kanboard.spec https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SRPM/kanboard-1.0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm Thanks in advance KR Please use your real full name in Bugzilla and send your self introduction to fedora-devel maling list according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Becoming_a_Fedora_Package_Collection_Maintainer Done, I already change my name on bugzilla and send my selft introduction to the list. KR - Make the package noarch. - Is web-assets-devel really needed? - Add config (no-replace) to all the config files in your package, for maintain user configurations - If you will package for EPEL family, you must to check what php versions are available in them; You have to use conditionals for disaggregate of that requires - You have to ship a httpd conf prepared for 2.2 and 2.4 versions - There are fonts in your package, you have to specify the licenses of them - the tests in your package can be run without internet connection? if so, please do it in %check section See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets for to know how to treat your static files in a rpm package Any update? Again, any update? @José, please start doing informal reviews so that the sponsorship process gets started. Looks like Echevemaster could sponsor you, so please answer him, he will be a good mentor to you :) Many people are waiting to have kanboard in Fedora, so do your best ! magjogui's scratch build of kanboard-1.0.18-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm for f22 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11273590 magjogui's scratch build of kanboard-1.0.18-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11273649 Hi, I will take your review request, please update to the last upstream release: https://github.com/kanboard/kanboard/releases/tag/v1.0.36 Any update? Any update here? If not answer I will must to close this ticket as a DEADREVIEW Final ping This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |