Reporting my package Spec URL: https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SPEC/ SRPM URL: https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SRPM/ Description: Kanboard is a simple visual task board web application. Fedora Account System Username: magjogui
Magjoqui can you paste the direct links to the files? This is not due a cosmetic thing, generally, the srpm are revised with a tool called fedora-review which needs direct links. magjogui is one of the guys that I was mentor in Fudcon, so, I will take care of its package and its mentoring process I'm blocking it with FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Thanks Eduardo, the links that you require: https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SPEC/kanboard.spec https://magjogui.fedorapeople.org/packages/kanboard/SRPM/kanboard-1.0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm Thanks in advance KR
Please use your real full name in Bugzilla and send your self introduction to fedora-devel maling list according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Becoming_a_Fedora_Package_Collection_Maintainer
Done, I already change my name on bugzilla and send my selft introduction to the list. KR
- Make the package noarch. - Is web-assets-devel really needed?
- Add config (no-replace) to all the config files in your package, for maintain user configurations - If you will package for EPEL family, you must to check what php versions are available in them; You have to use conditionals for disaggregate of that requires - You have to ship a httpd conf prepared for 2.2 and 2.4 versions - There are fonts in your package, you have to specify the licenses of them - the tests in your package can be run without internet connection? if so, please do it in %check section See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets for to know how to treat your static files in a rpm package
Any update?
Again, any update?
@José, please start doing informal reviews so that the sponsorship process gets started. Looks like Echevemaster could sponsor you, so please answer him, he will be a good mentor to you :) Many people are waiting to have kanboard in Fedora, so do your best !
magjogui's scratch build of kanboard-1.0.18-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm for f22 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11273590
magjogui's scratch build of kanboard-1.0.18-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11273649
Hi, I will take your review request, please update to the last upstream release: https://github.com/kanboard/kanboard/releases/tag/v1.0.36
Any update here? If not answer I will must to close this ticket as a DEADREVIEW
Final ping
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days