Bug 1159024

Summary: [PATCH] add rhel-5.9..11 and rhel-6.6 info to libosinfo
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Satoru SATOH <ssato>
Component: libosinfoAssignee: Daniel Berrangé <berrange>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 20CC: berrange, cfergeau, crobinso, virt-maint, zeenix
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-04-14 22:50:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch to add rhel-5.9..11 and rhel-6.6 info to libosinfo
none
Revised patch to add RHEL 5.9..11 and RHEL 6.6
none
One more patch to fix upgrades and derives-from of RHEL {5.9,6.6}
none
A patch to add rhel-5.{9,10,11} and rhel-6.6 info data
none
Patch to add test/isodata of RHEL 5.{9..11} and RHEL 6.6
none
Updated patch none

Description Satoru SATOH 2014-10-30 17:37:35 UTC 
Created attachment 952291 [details]
patch to add rhel-5.9..11 and rhel-6.6 info to libosinfo

Description of problem:
Some recent RHEL releases are missing in the database in libosinfo
and I made an experimental patch to fix this.

The data (release-date, etc.) are taken from:
https://access.redhat.com/articles/3078


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
As far as I checked, it master HEAD, latest version in F20, F21
look having this issue.
Comment 1 Satoru SATOH 2014-10-31 02:02:59 UTC 
Created attachment 952377 [details]
Revised patch to add RHEL 5.9..11 and RHEL 6.6

Sorry, I wrongly made a patch for rhel.xml instead of rhel.xml.in.
I made another patch to correct this.
Comment 2 Satoru SATOH 2014-10-31 02:08:27 UTC 
Created attachment 952378 [details]
One more patch to fix upgrades and derives-from of RHEL {5.9,6.6}

Excuse me, one more fix to correct //upgrades and //derives-from of RHEL {5.9, 6.6}.
Comment 3 Christophe Fergeau 2014-10-31 13:04:48 UTC 
Thanks for the patches!
The upgrade info for 5.10/5.11 needs fixing too. If you have the isos for these versions of RHEL, it would be great if you could add the output of "isoinfo -d -i xxx.iso" to the testsuite too.
A patch generated with git format-patch would be ideal for easier application.
Comment 4 Satoru SATOH 2014-11-03 13:36:57 UTC 
Created attachment 953100 [details]
A patch to add rhel-5.{9,10,11} and rhel-6.6 info data
Comment 5 Satoru SATOH 2014-11-03 13:39:03 UTC 
Created attachment 953101 [details]
Patch to add test/isodata of RHEL 5.{9..11} and RHEL 6.6

I've not tested these yet but post here just in case.
Comment 6 Christophe Fergeau 2014-11-06 15:32:46 UTC 
You can test these by running 'make check', and this actually uncovers an issue with your patch, the volume id for rhel 6.6 is different than previous versions:
-        <volume-id>.*RHEL_6.6 x86_64.*</volume-id>
+        <volume-id>.*RHEL-6.6 .*.x86_64.*</volume-id>
Comment 7 Christophe Fergeau 2014-11-06 15:34:17 UTC 
Created attachment 954502 [details]
Updated patch

Let me know if this patch looks good to you (including the commit log and your name/email).
Comment 8 Satoru SATOH 2014-11-09 12:39:27 UTC 
Thank you for the clean up of the patches. LGTM!
Comment 9 Cole Robinson 2015-04-14 22:50:14 UTC 
This is upstream now, so closing