Created attachment 952291 [details] patch to add rhel-5.9..11 and rhel-6.6 info to libosinfo Description of problem: Some recent RHEL releases are missing in the database in libosinfo and I made an experimental patch to fix this. The data (release-date, etc.) are taken from: https://access.redhat.com/articles/3078 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): As far as I checked, it master HEAD, latest version in F20, F21 look having this issue.
Created attachment 952377 [details] Revised patch to add RHEL 5.9..11 and RHEL 6.6 Sorry, I wrongly made a patch for rhel.xml instead of rhel.xml.in. I made another patch to correct this.
Created attachment 952378 [details] One more patch to fix upgrades and derives-from of RHEL {5.9,6.6} Excuse me, one more fix to correct //upgrades and //derives-from of RHEL {5.9, 6.6}.
Thanks for the patches! The upgrade info for 5.10/5.11 needs fixing too. If you have the isos for these versions of RHEL, it would be great if you could add the output of "isoinfo -d -i xxx.iso" to the testsuite too. A patch generated with git format-patch would be ideal for easier application.
Created attachment 953100 [details] A patch to add rhel-5.{9,10,11} and rhel-6.6 info data
Created attachment 953101 [details] Patch to add test/isodata of RHEL 5.{9..11} and RHEL 6.6 I've not tested these yet but post here just in case.
You can test these by running 'make check', and this actually uncovers an issue with your patch, the volume id for rhel 6.6 is different than previous versions: - <volume-id>.*RHEL_6.6 x86_64.*</volume-id> + <volume-id>.*RHEL-6.6 .*.x86_64.*</volume-id>
Created attachment 954502 [details] Updated patch Let me know if this patch looks good to you (including the commit log and your name/email).
Thank you for the clean up of the patches. LGTM!
This is upstream now, so closing