Bug 1159598

Summary: [RFE][heat]: Implement 'InstanceId' for LaunchConfiguration
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: RHOS Integration <rhos-integ>
Component: openstack-heatAssignee: Zane Bitter <zbitter>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Amit Ugol <augol>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: unspecifiedCC: ddomingo, markmc, nbarcet, sbaker, shardy, yeylon
Target Milestone: Upstream M2Keywords: FutureFeature, OtherQA
Target Release: 7.0 (Kilo)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/implement-instanceid-for-launchconfiguration
Whiteboard: upstream_milestone_kilo-2 upstream_definition_approved upstream_status_implemented
Fixed In Version: openstack-heat-2015.1.0-3.el7ost Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
The AWS::AutoScaling::LaunchConfiguration resource type now supports an 'InstanceId' property. This allows the launch configuration for an autoscaling group to be cloned from an existing server.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-05 13:15:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description RHOS Integration 2014-11-02 04:02:52 UTC
Cloned from launchpad blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/implement-instanceid-for-launchconfiguration.

Description:

In cloudFormation, user can use property 'InstanceId' if he want the launch configuration to use settings from an existing instance.
see http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-properties-as-launchconfig.html
Will be good to implement this in heat.

Specification URL (additional information):

None

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2015-08-05 13:15:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015:1548