Bug 1162699

Summary:	No plymouth splash screen on boot
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Anatoly Litovsky <tlitovsk>
Component:	ovirt-node	Assignee:	Anatoly Litovsky <tlitovsk>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	3.5.0	CC:	cshao, ecohen, fdeutsch, gklein, hadong, huiwa, iheim, leiwang, lsurette, virt-bugs, yaniwang, ycui
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	3.5.2
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	node
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-02-26 10:30:10 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Node	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1094719

Description Anatoly Litovsky 2014-11-11 13:55:28 UTC

Description of problem:


RHEVH 3.5 over el7 
Error on plymouth when installing 
And no splash screen on boot after install


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
Install observe error on plymouth  (but dissapears quickly)

Actual results:
On boot no splash screen 

Expected results:
Splash screen on boot

Additional info:
plymouth bug

Comment 1 cshao 2014-11-17 03:20:15 UTC

Hi fabiand,

I noticed there was a old bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136392 for trace "plymouth: command not found" issue, seems they are the same issue.

Comment 2 cshao 2014-11-17 03:26:17 UTC

The old bug was closed by the new one due to this bug is more clear that it is related to plymouth. So please ignore my comments :)

Comment 4 Fabian Deutsch 2014-11-18 12:04:38 UTC

It could be that some depdencies are missing. One thing to remember is that we have constraints in the terms of size of the iso image (it must not exceed 250MBytes).

Comment 6 Fabian Deutsch 2015-02-24 16:08:21 UTC

Is this already fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0?

Comment 7 cshao 2015-02-25 03:12:10 UTC

(In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #6)
> Is this already fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0?

Yes, it was fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0.

Comment 9 Fabian Deutsch 2015-02-26 10:30:10 UTC

(In reply to shaochen from comment #7)
> (In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #6)
> > Is this already fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0?
> 
> Yes, it was fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0.

Thanks.

Closing as of comment 7.