Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1162699

Summary: No plymouth splash screen on boot
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reporter: Anatoly Litovsky <tlitovsk>
Component: ovirt-nodeAssignee: Anatoly Litovsky <tlitovsk>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 3.5.0CC: cshao, ecohen, fdeutsch, gklein, hadong, huiwa, iheim, leiwang, lsurette, virt-bugs, yaniwang, ycui
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 3.5.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: node
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-26 10:30:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Node RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1094719    

Description Anatoly Litovsky 2014-11-11 13:55:28 UTC 
Description of problem:


RHEVH 3.5 over el7 
Error on plymouth when installing 
And no splash screen on boot after install


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
Install observe error on plymouth  (but dissapears quickly)

Actual results:
On boot no splash screen 

Expected results:
Splash screen on boot

Additional info:
plymouth bug
Comment 1 cshao 2014-11-17 03:20:15 UTC 
Hi fabiand,

I noticed there was a old bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136392 for trace "plymouth: command not found" issue, seems they are the same issue.
Comment 2 cshao 2014-11-17 03:26:17 UTC 
The old bug was closed by the new one due to this bug is more clear that it is related to plymouth. So please ignore my comments :)
Comment 4 Fabian Deutsch 2014-11-18 12:04:38 UTC 
It could be that some depdencies are missing. One thing to remember is that we have constraints in the terms of size of the iso image (it must not exceed 250MBytes).
Comment 6 Fabian Deutsch 2015-02-24 16:08:21 UTC 
Is this already fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0?
Comment 7 cshao 2015-02-25 03:12:10 UTC 
(In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #6)
> Is this already fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0?

Yes, it was fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0.
Comment 9 Fabian Deutsch 2015-02-26 10:30:10 UTC 
(In reply to shaochen from comment #7)
> (In reply to Fabian Deutsch from comment #6)
> > Is this already fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0?
> 
> Yes, it was fixed in rhev-hypervisor7-7.0-20150127.0.

Thanks.

Closing as of comment 7.