Bug 1163968
Summary: | rhsmcertd.service should be enabled by default in systemd presets | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | William Poteat <wpoteat> |
Component: | redhat-release | Assignee: | Lubos Kocman <lkocman> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.1 | CC: | alikins, bcourt, bkearney, dgoodwin, extras-qa, jbowes, khowell, lnykryn, luto, systemd-maint-list |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1094932 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2017-02-07 11:38:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1271839 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1090684, 1094932, 1121117, 1378128 |
Description
William Poteat
2014-11-13 19:54:32 UTC
Why is this reported against systemd? Aren't the systemd folks resposible for the preset poicy list? Nope. Is there a particular order this and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094932 need to happen in? ie, if I change the subman post scripts to use systemd macros, does the systemd defaults have to change first? (If we change subman spec to use the macros without the systemd defaults, rhsmd will be disabled by default in builds until redhat-release-server updates the defaults correct? Afaik, that should be fine assuming it will get changed before GA. Only downside is it might temporarily break some qe automation...) The preset should change before we change the packaging of subscription-manager, as a change to the preset won't affect the package negatively, but changing the package first will cause it to be disabled by default (as described in comment 5). Therefore, I'm reversing the relationship of this bug and bug 1094932. Wrong bug. Apologies. Adding devel ack+ based on comment in linked bug. We do have a lot of preset changes scheduled. Lubos *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1271839 *** |