Bug 1166174

Summary: 69-dm-lvm-metad.rules calls systemd-run
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Kurik <jkurik>
Component: lvm2Assignee: LVM and device-mapper development team <lvm-team>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: cluster-qe <cluster-qe>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.6CC: agk, amureini, bmr, cmarthal, dwysocha, fdeutsch, fsimonce, heinzm, jbrassow, jkurik, mjuricek, mkarg, msnitzer, nsoffer, pablo.iranzo, pm-eus, prajnoha, prockai, rjones, tdosek, thornber, zkabelac
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: lvm2-2.02.111-2.el6_6.1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
A bug in lvm2 configuration script caused improper detection of environment used which ended up with incorrect udev rules for lvmetad notification to be generated (/lib/udev/rules.d/69-dm-lvm-metad.rules). These rules contained incorrect calls specific for systemd environment only which is not present in RHEL6. As a consequence, if lvmetad was used (global/use_lvmetad=1 lvm.conf option), then lvmetad daemon missed notifications about PVs present in the system and lvmetad could not provide proper cached information to LVM tools. This also caused any LVs to not autoactivate when all the PVs making up the VG were present in the system.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1165596 Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-11-26 09:36:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1165596    
Bug Blocks: 1153323    

Description Jan Kurik 2014-11-20 13:58:58 UTC
This bug has been copied from bug #1165596 and has been proposed
to be backported to 6.6 z-stream (EUS).

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2014-11-26 09:36:34 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1909.html