Bug 1168929

Summary: Please provide /etc/ax25 directory
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Component: libax25Assignee: Richard Shaw <hobbes1069>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: bobjensen, ralf, randyn3lrx, sindrepb
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-02 15:06:08 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Propsed fix none

Description Jaroslav Škarvada 2014-11-28 12:49:10 UTC 
Description of problem:
The libax25 is reading configuration from /etc/ax25. This directory should be provided by the libax25 package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libax25-0.0.12-0.6.rc2.fc20

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -ql libax25 | grep /etc/ax25

Actual results:
No match

Expected results:
Match

Additional info:
There are other packages (namely uronode, node, aprsdigi) installing configs to /etc/ax25 and there is currently nothing providing this directory.
Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2014-11-28 12:50:23 UTC 
Created attachment 962479 [details]
Propsed fix
Comment 2 Ralf Baechle 2015-05-28 08:40:31 UTC 
Upstream commit fe7b81a8ca94a1a32878e06b6ea68d30f73a45bd (RPM: Include /etc/ax25 dir into package.) [1] fixes the issue.  Since the generated spec file now also does `make installconf' to install the config files the explicit mkdir from the attached proposed fix is no longer necessary.

[1] See http://git.linux-ax25.org/cgit/libax25.git/commit/
Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2015-05-28 10:25:09 UTC 
(In reply to Ralf Baechle from comment #2)
Thanks.
Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2015-06-14 20:29:23 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 5 Richard Shaw 2015-07-02 16:05:43 UTC 
Working on an update that includes this, however, I'm also updating to rc4 and I'm not sure it's ABI compatible so I need to figure out what all requires libax25 and they will likely need to be rebuilt.
Comment 6 Jaroslav Škarvada 2015-07-02 16:09:19 UTC 
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #5)
> Working on an update that includes this, however, I'm also updating to rc4
> and I'm not sure it's ABI compatible so I need to figure out what all
> requires libax25 and they will likely need to be rebuilt.

Thanks, I got the following by repoquery in fedora (may be incomplete):
aprsd-0:2.2.5-15.6.fc23.11.x86_64
aprsdigi-0:3.5.1-5.fc23.x86_64
ax25-apps-0:0.0.6-20.fc23.x86_64
ax25-tools-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64
ax25-tools-x-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64
fbb-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64
fbb-gui-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64
libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.i686
libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.x86_64
node-0:0.3.2-17.fc23.x86_64
uronode-0:2.3.1-5.fc23.x86_64
xastir-1:2.0.6-2.fc23.x86_64
Comment 7 Jaroslav Škarvada 2015-07-02 16:11:48 UTC 
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #5)
> > Working on an update that includes this, however, I'm also updating to rc4
> > and I'm not sure it's ABI compatible so I need to figure out what all
> > requires libax25 and they will likely need to be rebuilt.
> 
> Thanks, I got the following by repoquery in fedora (may be incomplete):
> aprsd-0:2.2.5-15.6.fc23.11.x86_64
> aprsdigi-0:3.5.1-5.fc23.x86_64
> ax25-apps-0:0.0.6-20.fc23.x86_64
> ax25-tools-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64
> ax25-tools-x-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64
> fbb-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64
> fbb-gui-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64
> libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.i686
> libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.x86_64
> node-0:0.3.2-17.fc23.x86_64
> uronode-0:2.3.1-5.fc23.x86_64
> xastir-1:2.0.6-2.fc23.x86_64

Corresponding SRPMs:
aprsdigi-3.5.1-5.fc23.src.rpm
aprsd-2.2.5-15.6.fc23.11.src.rpm
ax25-apps-0.0.6-20.fc23.src.rpm
ax25-tools-0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.src.rpm
fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.src.rpm
libax25-0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.src.rpm
node-0.3.2-17.fc23.src.rpm
uronode-2.3.1-5.fc23.src.rpm
xastir-2.0.6-2.fc23.src.rpm
Comment 8 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 14:36:14 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23
Comment 9 Richard Shaw 2015-11-02 15:06:08 UTC 
Rawhide has been fixed, I also moved over to the better supported fork of libax25, ax25-tools, and ax25-apps.