Description of problem: The libax25 is reading configuration from /etc/ax25. This directory should be provided by the libax25 package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libax25-0.0.12-0.6.rc2.fc20 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -ql libax25 | grep /etc/ax25 Actual results: No match Expected results: Match Additional info: There are other packages (namely uronode, node, aprsdigi) installing configs to /etc/ax25 and there is currently nothing providing this directory.
Created attachment 962479 [details] Propsed fix
Upstream commit fe7b81a8ca94a1a32878e06b6ea68d30f73a45bd (RPM: Include /etc/ax25 dir into package.) [1] fixes the issue. Since the generated spec file now also does `make installconf' to install the config files the explicit mkdir from the attached proposed fix is no longer necessary. [1] See http://git.linux-ax25.org/cgit/libax25.git/commit/
(In reply to Ralf Baechle from comment #2) Thanks.
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Working on an update that includes this, however, I'm also updating to rc4 and I'm not sure it's ABI compatible so I need to figure out what all requires libax25 and they will likely need to be rebuilt.
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #5) > Working on an update that includes this, however, I'm also updating to rc4 > and I'm not sure it's ABI compatible so I need to figure out what all > requires libax25 and they will likely need to be rebuilt. Thanks, I got the following by repoquery in fedora (may be incomplete): aprsd-0:2.2.5-15.6.fc23.11.x86_64 aprsdigi-0:3.5.1-5.fc23.x86_64 ax25-apps-0:0.0.6-20.fc23.x86_64 ax25-tools-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64 ax25-tools-x-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64 fbb-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64 fbb-gui-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64 libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.i686 libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.x86_64 node-0:0.3.2-17.fc23.x86_64 uronode-0:2.3.1-5.fc23.x86_64 xastir-1:2.0.6-2.fc23.x86_64
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #5) > > Working on an update that includes this, however, I'm also updating to rc4 > > and I'm not sure it's ABI compatible so I need to figure out what all > > requires libax25 and they will likely need to be rebuilt. > > Thanks, I got the following by repoquery in fedora (may be incomplete): > aprsd-0:2.2.5-15.6.fc23.11.x86_64 > aprsdigi-0:3.5.1-5.fc23.x86_64 > ax25-apps-0:0.0.6-20.fc23.x86_64 > ax25-tools-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64 > ax25-tools-x-0:0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.x86_64 > fbb-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64 > fbb-gui-0:7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.x86_64 > libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.i686 > libax25-devel-0:0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.x86_64 > node-0:0.3.2-17.fc23.x86_64 > uronode-0:2.3.1-5.fc23.x86_64 > xastir-1:2.0.6-2.fc23.x86_64 Corresponding SRPMs: aprsdigi-3.5.1-5.fc23.src.rpm aprsd-2.2.5-15.6.fc23.11.src.rpm ax25-apps-0.0.6-20.fc23.src.rpm ax25-tools-0.0.10-0.13.rc2.fc23.src.rpm fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc23.1.src.rpm libax25-0.0.12-0.9.rc2.fc23.src.rpm node-0.3.2-17.fc23.src.rpm uronode-2.3.1-5.fc23.src.rpm xastir-2.0.6-2.fc23.src.rpm
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle. Changing version to '23'. (As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.) More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23
Rawhide has been fixed, I also moved over to the better supported fork of libax25, ax25-tools, and ax25-apps.