Bug 116949

Summary:	need mozilla relnote
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component:	fedora-release	Assignee:	Ed Bailey <ed>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-03-17 19:31:06 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	114398

Description Bill Nottingham 2004-02-26 18:09:52 UTC

Something like:
...
Mozilla in FC1 for x86-64 is shipped as a 32-bit application.
Future Fedora Core releases will ship Mozilla as a 64-bit application;
this means that 32-bit plugins will not work.

64-bit Mozilla may also be pushed in future updates to Fedora Core 1.
...

Comment 1 Ed Bailey 2004-02-26 18:27:48 UTC

Here's what I have; is this OK?

"Mozilla as shipped with Fedora Core 1 for x86-64 was a 32-bit
application. Future Fedora Core releases will ship Mozilla as a 64-bit
application; this means that, at that time, 32-bit plugins will no
longer work."

"Note

64-bit Mozilla may also be pushed in future updates to Fedora Core 1."

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-27 02:30:00 UTC

Sounds good.

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2004-03-17 18:59:08 UTC

Sure. Note that in FC2 test2, mozilla *is* a 64-bit app, so we may
want to mention that and just remove the note.

Comment 6 Bill Nottingham 2004-03-17 19:13:55 UTC

Potentially, but I'm not sure how that relates to FC2 release notes.
I think I've managed to confuse myself with which sets of notes we're
talking about.

Comment 7 Ed Bailey 2004-03-17 19:31:06 UTC

Ok, changed as requested...