Bug 1175306 (plasma-breeze)
Summary: | Review Request: plasma-breeze - Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Grulich <jgrulich> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dvratil, kevin, package-review, rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | rdieter:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-01-20 13:41:59 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1135103 |
Description
Jan Grulich
2014-12-17 13:28:40 UTC
Initial comments: (non-blockers) * I think I'd prefer to follow the upstream name here, and stick with just 'breeze', what's the justification to use a plasma- prefix here? * s|%{_qt5_prefix}/qml|%{_kf5_qmldir}| Renamed to breeze. Fixed macro. Spec URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/breeze.spec SRPM URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/breeze-5.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description:Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop. Fedora Account System Username: jgrulich Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8513700 Naming: ok (though some suggestions follow) 1. Sorry, thinking it over, we SHOULD keep the plasma- prefix. We already did set some precedent with plasma-oxygen and should stay consistent. 2. on the topic of consistency and precedent, SHOULD rename breeze-kde4 to kde-style-breeze, but won't consider that a blocker. We (kde-sig) probably ought to discuss how best to handle that moving forward. 3. breeze-icon-theme SHOULD be split out into subpkg (add MUST add proper icon scriptlets) sources: ok 81c324560667424a99beeb0657c02ba5 breeze-5.1.1.tar.xz licensing: ok 4. SHOULD use better project URL, I'd suggest URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/breeze 5. SHOULD prefer/use make install/fast DESTDIR=%{buildroot} over %make_install 1. Renamed back 2. Renamed 3. Created subpkg + added missing scriptlets 4. Fixed url 5. Fixed Spec URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/plasma-breeze.spec SRPM URL: https://jgrulich.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/plasma-breeze-5.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8527191 looks good, APPROVED New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: plasma-breeze Short Description: Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/breeze Owners: @kde-sig rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f21 InitialCC: WARNING: "@kde-sig" is not a valid FAS account. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: plasma-breeze Short Description: Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/breeze Owners: group::kde-sig rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f21 InitialCC: WARNING: "group::kde-sig" is not a valid FAS account. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: plasma-breeze Short Description: Artwork, styles and assets for the Breeze visual style for the Plasma Desktop Upstream URL: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/workspace/breeze Owners: rdieter kkofler dvratil than jgrulich ltinkl Branches: f21 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). |