Bug 1187741
Summary: | dnf should state if packages explicitly requested for update aren't installed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | bryant |
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Honza Silhan <jsilhan> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 21 | CC: | akozumpl, fedora, jsilhan, mluscon, pnemade, rholy, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-06-21 00:16:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
bryant
2015-01-30 18:54:25 UTC
Thanks for the report. Fixed. PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/220 Excellent, looked at the PR and it looks good (I know Python but not familiar with DNF's internals). Did you decide that adding a prompt to install the software that was requested isn't worth the code complexity? I think it'd be very nice from a UX perspective though I could see how it could be a lot of extra code. See also Bug #1195106. I'd like more information than a confirmation of "nope, couldn't do it". I'd like to know *why*. Especially since it's being held back to a Fedora 20 version... dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22 Package dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-10004/dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22 then log in and leave karma (feedback). dnf-1.0.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Yep, this fixed it now. Thanks! |