Bug 1191410

Summary:	New package request: deltaspike-core-api
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo>
Component:	maven	Assignee:	Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	akurtako, java-sig-commits, mizdebsk, msimacek, msrb
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-02-11 09:56:00 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1168605

Description Sandro Bonazzola 2015-02-11 09:44:41 UTC

Please provide a spring package satisfying mvn(org.apache.deltaspike.core:deltaspike-core-api) dependency.

 yum provides "mvn(org.apache.deltaspike.core:deltaspike-core-api)"
 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
  * rawhide: mirror.switch.ch
 No matches found

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2015-02-11 09:56:00 UTC

Fedora packagers are heavily overloaded with maintaining hundreds of packages each. If you want to see this package entering Fedora you would have to do the work. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for the process to do it.
Please note that this is in no way maven package bug so as a bare minimum don't open bugs against it.

Comment 2 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-02-11 09:57:15 UTC

*** Bug 1191383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Mikolaj Izdebski 2015-02-11 09:57:20 UTC

*** Bug 1191415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Alexander Kurtakov 2015-02-11 10:00:20 UTC

As an additional note - please join #fedora-java on freenode do discuss what you plan to do and get in contact with people maintaining maven build system (this doesn't mean providing everything that's in repo.maven.org).

Comment 5 Sandro Bonazzola 2015-02-11 14:24:55 UTC

Alexander, sorry, maybe distribution would have been better?
Goal is to package ovirt-engine following fedora packaging guidelines as per bug #1168605 which has been set in "blocks" field on bug creation.

I wasn't asking to make the whole repo.maven.org available in Fedora, I asked 5 packages in total.

Now, I can understand you're all overloaded and if I'll be able to contribute a spec file I'll do. Maven is not in my competencies and knowledge area but we'll see what I'll be able to do and when.