Bug 1196851

Summary:	Fleecing fails due to missing method.
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Rich Oliveri <roliveri>
Component:	SmartProxy	Assignee:	Rich Oliveri <roliveri>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milan Falešník <mfalesni>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.4.0	CC:	jhardy, mfalesni, roliveri, xlecauch
Target Milestone:	GA
Target Release:	5.4.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	5.4.0.0.11	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-06-16 12:51:38 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rich Oliveri 2015-02-26 23:13:25 UTC

Description of problem:

Attempts to fleece VMs fail with the log error:
undefined method `exist?' for #<Manageiq::BlackBox:0x0000000d813c08>


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 CFME Bot 2015-02-27 21:01:09 UTC

New commit detected on manageiq/master:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/463d06aefbf04ce052f7fc78cd0335a80adf6485

commit 463d06aefbf04ce052f7fc78cd0335a80adf6485
Author:     Richard Oliveri <roliveri>
AuthorDate: Fri Feb 27 13:12:30 2015 -0500
Commit:     Richard Oliveri <roliveri>
CommitDate: Fri Feb 27 13:12:30 2015 -0500

    Remove extraneous calls to BlackBox#exist?
    
    The definition of BlackBox#exist? was removed, however some references to it remained.
    Remove the extraneous reference.
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196851

 lib/blackbox/xmlStorage.rb | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comment 4 Milan Falešník 2015-03-26 14:23:49 UTC

Verified in 5.4.0.0.13 by doing a VM analysis including file fleecing and no error happened. Is this enough?

Comment 5 Rich Oliveri 2015-04-20 15:14:17 UTC

Yes, that should be enough.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-16 12:51:38 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1100.html