Bug 1196851 - Fleecing fails due to missing method.
Summary: Fleecing fails due to missing method.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: SmartProxy
Version: 5.4.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.4.0
Assignee: Rich Oliveri
QA Contact: Milan Falešník
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-02-26 23:13 UTC by Rich Oliveri
Modified: 2015-06-16 12:51 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.4.0.0.11
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-16 12:51:38 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1100 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE CFME 5.4.0 bug fixes, and enhancement update 2015-06-16 16:28:42 UTC

Description Rich Oliveri 2015-02-26 23:13:25 UTC
Description of problem:

Attempts to fleece VMs fail with the log error:
undefined method `exist?' for #<Manageiq::BlackBox:0x0000000d813c08>


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 CFME Bot 2015-02-27 21:01:09 UTC
New commit detected on manageiq/master:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/463d06aefbf04ce052f7fc78cd0335a80adf6485

commit 463d06aefbf04ce052f7fc78cd0335a80adf6485
Author:     Richard Oliveri <roliveri>
AuthorDate: Fri Feb 27 13:12:30 2015 -0500
Commit:     Richard Oliveri <roliveri>
CommitDate: Fri Feb 27 13:12:30 2015 -0500

    Remove extraneous calls to BlackBox#exist?
    
    The definition of BlackBox#exist? was removed, however some references to it remained.
    Remove the extraneous reference.
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196851

 lib/blackbox/xmlStorage.rb | 11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comment 4 Milan Falešník 2015-03-26 14:23:49 UTC
Verified in 5.4.0.0.13 by doing a VM analysis including file fleecing and no error happened. Is this enough?

Comment 5 Rich Oliveri 2015-04-20 15:14:17 UTC
Yes, that should be enough.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2015-06-16 12:51:38 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1100.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.