Bug 1197037
Summary: | Review Request: felix-scr - Apache Felix Declarative Services | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | gil cattaneo <puntogil> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | jkang, package-review, sgehwolf |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-06-11 16:52:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
gil cattaneo
2015-02-27 11:29:01 UTC
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #0) > Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/felix-scr.spec I get a 404 when trying to access this spec. (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #1) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #0) > > Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/felix-scr.spec > > I get a 404 when trying to access this spec. Yes, I know, I'm sorry. for now I'm not interested in doing so review. i have other open bugs with major priority. Thanks! Hello. I have been working on packaging this for Fedora as well. Gil, do you mind if I take over as reviewee? Fedora Account System Username: jkang Spec URL: https://jkang.fedorapeople.org/felix-scr.spec SRPM URL: https://jkang.fedorapeople.org/felix-scr-1.8.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Apache Felix Service Component Runtime implementation of OSGi Declarative Services Specification can you open a new one bug? and please remove unneeded: BuildRequires: javapackages-tools BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.8.0 Requires: java-headless >= 1:1.8.0 install with license macro LICENSE NOTICE files for each packages install with doc macro changelog.txt you must be sure that the system libraries are not copied in the archive JAR use: %pom_xpath_remove "pom:plugin[pom:artifactId='maven-bundle-plugin']/pom:configuration/pom:instructions/pom:Private-Package" %pom_xpath_remove "pom:plugin[pom:artifactId='maven-bundle-plugin']/pom:configuration/pom:instructions/pom:Embed-Dependency" %pom_xpath_remove "pom:plugin[pom:artifactId='maven-bundle-plugin']/pom:configuration/pom:instructions/pom:Export-Package" %pom_xpath_inject "pom:plugin[pom:artifactId='maven-bundle-plugin']/pom:configuration/pom:instructions" ' <Export-Package> org.apache.felix.scr;version=1.8, org.apache.felix.scr.component;version=1.0; mandatory:="status"; status="provisional" </Export-Package>' %pom_xpath_remove "pom:plugin[pom:artifactId='maven-bundle-plugin']/pom:configuration/pom:instructions/pom:Import-Package" %pom_xpath_inject "pom:plugin[pom:artifactId='maven-bundle-plugin']/pom:configuration/pom:instructions" ' <Import-Package> org.apache.felix.service.command;resolution:=optional, org.apache.felix.shell;provide:=true;resolution:=optional, org.osgi.framework;version="[1.4,2)", org.osgi.service.cm;version="[1.2,2)";resolution:=optional, org.osgi.service.log;version="[1.3,2)";resolution:=optional, org.osgi.service.metatype;version="[1.1,2)";resolution:=optional, org.osgi.service.packageadmin;version="[1.2,2)";resolution:=optional, org.osgi.service.component;provide:=true, org.apache.felix.scr;provide:=true, org.kxml2.io, org.osgi.util.tracker, org.xmlpull.v1 </Import-Package>' Hi, I opened a new bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867 I am also in the process of making the changes to the spec file. Thank you for your help! (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #10) > Hi, > > I opened a new bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867 > > I am also in the process of making the changes to the spec file. Thank you > for your help! Ops, are you in the packager group? if no see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process i'm not a proven packager i cant help, sorry (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #11) > (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #10) > > Hi, > > > > I opened a new bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867 > > > > I am also in the process of making the changes to the spec file. Thank you > > for your help! > > Ops, are you in the packager group? > if no see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Ah, I am not in the group so I would need to find a sponsor. I think Severin can help here? > i'm not a proven packager i cant help, sorry It's okay; Thank you still for help with the spec file. I am new to packaging things so I appreciate it! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1230867 *** (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #12) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #11) > > (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #10) > > > Hi, > > > > > > I opened a new bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230867 > > > > > > I am also in the process of making the changes to the spec file. Thank you > > > for your help! > > > > Ops, are you in the packager group? > > if no see: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > > Ah, I am not in the group so I would need to find a sponsor. I think Severin > can help here? > > > i'm not a proven packager i cant help, sorry > > It's okay; Thank you still for help with the spec file. I am new to > packaging things so I appreciate it! I don't think one needs to be provenpackager for sponsoring someone[1]. But yes, Jie will need a sponsor. I'll do the review on the new bug and then we go from there. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor |