Bug 1201298

Summary: Missing dependency in RabbitVCS: python-simplejson
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Juan Orti <jorti>
Component: rabbitvcsAssignee: Juan Manuel Rodriguez <nushio>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 21CC: fedoraproject, i, liblit, nushio
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-05 07:31:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Juan Orti 2015-03-12 13:25:13 UTC
Description of problem:
RabbitVCS doesn't work out of the box.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rabbitvcs-nautilus-0.16-3.fc21.x86_64
rabbitvcs-gedit-0.16-3.fc21.x86_64
rabbitvcs-core-0.16-3.fc21.noarch
rabbitvcs-cli-0.16-3.fc21.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. nautilus

Actual results:
$ nautilus
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/nautilus-python/extensions/RabbitVCS.py", line 79, in <module>
    import rabbitvcs.ui.property_page
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rabbitvcs/ui/property_page.py", line 40, in <module>
    from rabbitvcs.services.checkerservice import StatusCheckerStub as StatusChecker
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rabbitvcs/services/checkerservice.py", line 48, in <module>
    import simplejson
ImportError: No module named simplejson

Expected results:
RabbitVCS loaded

Additional info:
Please, add a dependency to python-simplejson

Comment 1 cube00 2015-10-04 06:41:06 UTC
Dup of 1083043

Comment 2 Ben Liblit 2015-10-04 23:09:38 UTC
Per comment #1, this bug report should

Comment 3 Ben Liblit 2015-10-04 23:10:47 UTC
Oops, sorry for my incomplete comment #2.  I meant to say that per comment #1, this bug report should be marked as a duplicate of bug #1083043.  I don't have the power to do that myself..  Can we get some help here?

Comment 4 Juan Orti 2015-10-05 07:31:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1083043 ***