Bug 1202343

Summary: user (with discovery_manager) is unable to check/uncheck discovered host, user can only select_all
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Sachin Ghai <sghai>
Component: Discovery PluginAssignee: Lukas Zapletal <lzap>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Sachin Ghai <sghai>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1.0CC: bbuckingham, bkearney, lzap
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-20 19:47:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1193977    
Attachments:
Description Flags
see the checkboxes are disabled but user can select all on clicking "Name" none

Description Sachin Ghai 2015-03-16 12:52:44 UTC
Created attachment 1002246 [details]
see the checkboxes are disabled but user can select all on clicking "Name"

Description of problem:
User can't select specific discovered hosts, because checkboxes are disabled. But user can select all. this needs to be fixed.

user should be able to check/uncheck selected discovered hosts

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sat6.1 beta snap6 compose2 (Satellite-6.1.0-RHEL-6-20150311.1).

How reproducible:
always 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Assign "discovery_Manger role to new created user
2. login with new user
2. go to hosts --> discovered_host page
3. select a specific host

Actual results:
User can't select specific discovered hosts, because checkboxes are disabled. But user can select all. this needs to be fixed.

Expected results:

user should be able to check/uncheck selected discovered hosts

Additional info:

Comment 2 Lukas Zapletal 2016-05-12 15:36:24 UTC
Brad, if possible, I suggest this one for GA, since mass assignment is actually a workaround for Taxonomy.

Comment 4 Lukas Zapletal 2016-05-13 14:04:22 UTC
Hi, not a regression I assume. I think z-stream is reasonable, sure.

Comment 6 Lukas Zapletal 2017-05-24 08:43:32 UTC
This was fixed I believe in 6.3, plese give it a spin.