Bug 1203603

Summary: The binutils package contains the windmc(1) manual page but the utility is not included
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Martin Cermak <mcermak>
Component: binutilsAssignee: Jeff Law <law>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Miloš Prchlík <mprchlik>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.2CC: jhradile, law, mcermak, mprchlik, ohudlick, pfrankli, tlavigne
Target Milestone: alpha   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: binutils-2.23.52.0.1-34.el7 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 850832 Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-11-19 03:42:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Martin Cermak 2015-03-19 09:11:59 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #850832 +++

Description of problem:
The binutils package contains the windmc(1) manual page, but the windmc utility is not included in the package. This is confusing, because if a utility is documented, people expect it to be present in the system.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.34.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Make sure the binutils package is installed:

   # yum install binutils

2. Access the manual page for the windmc utility:

   $ man windmc

3. Attempt to run the utility itself:

   $ windmc
  
Actual results:
I can see the manual page, but the utility is clearly not there:

   $ rpm -ql binutils | grep windmc
   /usr/share/man/man1/windmc.1.gz

Expected results:
Either the /usr/share/man/man1/windmc.1.gz file should be removed, or the windmc utility should be added to the package.

Comment 7 Miloš Prchlík 2015-10-12 13:18:57 UTC
Verified for build binutils-2.23.52.0.1-54.el7.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-11-19 03:42:00 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2079.html