Bug 1213823

Summary: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Petr Pisar <ppisar>
Component: perl-Net-DNS-SECAssignee: Wes Hardaker <wjhns174>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 23CC: perl-devel, pwouters, wjhns174
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-3.fc23 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-24 13:02:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1215725, 1215738    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Petr Pisar 2015-04-21 11:22:20 UTC
# dnf --enablerepo=f23-build install --best perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Using metadata from Tue Apr 21 09:46:27 2015 (3:32:54 hours old)
Error: nothing provides perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro) needed by perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch

buildsys robot reports:

perl-Net-DNS-SEC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro)
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST) >= 0:0.06
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.06
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.05
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:1.01
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:0.5

Comment 1 Petr Pisar 2015-04-27 16:44:46 UTC
The Digest::GOST provided by Digest-GOST-0.06 contain implementation of RFC 4357 a.k.a. GOST R 34.11-94. This was not allowed by Fedora legal department <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-June/001298.html>. We can ask again, but because current OpenSSL has still disabled the support, I don't think the legal opinion did not change.

Comment 2 Wes Hardaker 2015-04-28 18:10:18 UTC
The current git tree does not require that GOST be installed, and the package builds cleanly without GOST installed on the system.  So I'm confused why anyone is even seeing the above error messages in the first place.  The build (provided by Net::DNS::SEC) is checking for whether GOST support exists and doesn't include it if the prereqs are missing.

Comment 3 Petr Pisar 2015-04-29 08:16:56 UTC
That because SEC/ECCGOST.pm uses the modules unconditionally:

    51  use Crypt::OpenSSL::EC 1.01;
    52  use Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA 0.06;
    53  use Digest::GOST 0.06;
    54  use Digest::GOST::CryptoPro;

and the file is packaged as /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/DNS/SEC/ECCGOST.pm.

Comment 4 Wes Hardaker 2015-04-30 17:04:43 UTC
Ahh...  I should have known the auto-requirement-finder would pop up.

Fix being pushed.

Comment 5 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 14:15:22 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-24 11:43:04 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.