Bug 1213823 - perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies
Summary: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Version: 23
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Wes Hardaker
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1215725 1215738
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-04-21 11:22 UTC by Petr Pisar
Modified: 2016-11-24 13:02 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-3.fc23
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-24 13:02:00 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petr Pisar 2015-04-21 11:22:20 UTC
# dnf --enablerepo=f23-build install --best perl-Net-DNS-SEC
Using metadata from Tue Apr 21 09:46:27 2015 (3:32:54 hours old)
Error: nothing provides perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro) needed by perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch

buildsys robot reports:

perl-Net-DNS-SEC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro)
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST) >= 0:0.06
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.06
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.05
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:1.01
        perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:0.5

Comment 1 Petr Pisar 2015-04-27 16:44:46 UTC
The Digest::GOST provided by Digest-GOST-0.06 contain implementation of RFC 4357 a.k.a. GOST R 34.11-94. This was not allowed by Fedora legal department <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2010-June/001298.html>. We can ask again, but because current OpenSSL has still disabled the support, I don't think the legal opinion did not change.

Comment 2 Wes Hardaker 2015-04-28 18:10:18 UTC
The current git tree does not require that GOST be installed, and the package builds cleanly without GOST installed on the system.  So I'm confused why anyone is even seeing the above error messages in the first place.  The build (provided by Net::DNS::SEC) is checking for whether GOST support exists and doesn't include it if the prereqs are missing.

Comment 3 Petr Pisar 2015-04-29 08:16:56 UTC
That because SEC/ECCGOST.pm uses the modules unconditionally:

    51  use Crypt::OpenSSL::EC 1.01;
    52  use Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA 0.06;
    53  use Digest::GOST 0.06;
    54  use Digest::GOST::CryptoPro;

and the file is packaged as /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Net/DNS/SEC/ECCGOST.pm.

Comment 4 Wes Hardaker 2015-04-30 17:04:43 UTC
Ahh...  I should have known the auto-requirement-finder would pop up.

Fix being pushed.

Comment 5 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 14:15:22 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora23

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-24 11:43:04 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.